How
much do we spend fighting drugs in Australia?
The
Australian government spends about $1.1 billion enforcing illicit
drug laws every year. Most of this is spent at a state level, funding
the police force and supplying prison services to low-level drug
users. Another chunk of that money is spent by federal police.
The United States spends about $500 per second fighting the war on drugs. One commonly cited statistic is that the US spent over $1 trillion on cracking down on drugs in the last four decades.
According
to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in 2010 $1.05 billion worth
of crystal meth was sold on the black market. The profit margin? An
estimated $1.03 billion. And that’s just one drug. The Sydney
Morning Herald estimates that if we were to regulate drug sales
through a legal market, we could save almost $5 billion a year by
cutting down the funding to police and prisons and by raking in the
taxes. Since the 1980's, Australia has spent about a third of its
$1.7 billion-a-year drug budget on preventive measures such as drug
treatment, and needle exchange programs.
Has
the war on drugs achieved any of its goals?
According
to the Australian Crime Commission in its 2012-2013 report on illicit
drug data, drug seizures and arrests are at an all-time high. Maybe
we’re getting better at stopping drugs from circulating. Or, less
optimistically, maybe there are more drugs on the street to seize.
CANNABIS
KEY POINTS
*There
were a record 3,629 cannabis detections at the Australian border in
2012–13, with cannabis seeds continuing to account for the majority
of detections.
*The
number and weight of national cannabis seizures increased, with the
number of seizures the highest reported in the last decade.
*National
cannabis arrests continued to increase, with the 62,120 arrests in
2012–13 the highest number reported in the last decade.
In
2007,
the European Commission produced a report detailing drug use patterns
over the preceding 10 years. The results? No change. The drug problem
got better in some countries but a lot worse in others. In 2008,
the Global
Commission on Narcotic Drugs admitted that cannabis, opiate and
cocaine use had increased considerably over the previous decade. “The
global war on drugs has failed,” said the report. Though perhaps
the problem would be worse were it not for hard-line policies.
UNITED
NATIONS ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL DRUG CONSUMPTION, 1998 TO 2008
Opiates Cocaine Cannabis
1998 12.9
million 13.4 million 147.4 million
2008 17.35
million 17 million 160 million
%
Increase 34.5% 27% 8.5%
In
Australia, if drug prices are any indication, our problem is not
going away any time soon. Despite our tough-on-crime approach and the
best efforts by our police and special task forces, street drugs are
just as readily available in this country as they have ever been.
David McDonald, Director of Social Research & Evaluation Pty
Ltd, critiques illicit drug policy. “The most concerning aspect,”
he said, “is that most of the illegal drugs continue to be not only
readily available but very cheap. In fact the prices of drugs have
fallen over the years, which demonstrates the absolute failure of a
law enforcement approach.” But what about all the drug busts? Huge
quantities of marijuana found? Arrests made? Surely by making drugs
more difficult to obtain, their prices should increase? “That
hasn’t happened. Drugs remain cheap, high quality and readily
available.”
What
measures are available other than law enforcement?
In
Australia, about one person every day dies from an illicit drug
overdose. Increasingly, policy makers are realising that resources
could be better allocated to addressing the harm that drugs cause. In
2010, when President Obama, newly elected, deliberately eased the
international pressure on drug prohibition, he declared that drug use
should be thought of as a healthcare problem. “The research
evidence is absolutely clear,” said McDonald. “You get far better
outcomes and far greater cost effectiveness from treatment and harm
reduction than you do from law enforcement.”
Research
has shown that the legal status of a drug has little bearing on its
use; some people will always use. Some will never use. Four
Australian states - South Australia, the Australian Capital
Territory, the Northern Territory and Western Australia - have
decriminalised minor cannabis offences such as possession, which is
now treated much like a parking fine, delivered on the spot. Western
Australia re-criminalised these minor offences in 2010, so users must
be processed through the criminal justice system once again, despite
the fact that during the decriminalised period there was a
significant decrease in cannabis use, from 13.7% to 10.8%.
Decriminalisation
has not caused an increase in drug use, as expected, in any states.
According to McDonald, “the studies showed that it actually
produced good results in the sense that young people weren’t
involved in the criminal justice system and having to get criminal
records”.
Could
we take this further and apply the same model to other drugs? Would
we see the same positive effects? “We definitely would with regard
to drugs like ecstasy, heroin, cocaine and LSD, because with drugs
like those the dynamics are the same. Some people argue that we
should actually get rid of the offences of possessing small
quantities and consuming drugs and simply retain the offences of
supplying drugs or manufacturing and cultivating large quantities,”
said McDonald. Most
arrests relating to drugs are made for minor offences, such as
possessing for personal use. “Since that doesn’t achieve anything
worthwhile, and does create harms, in a logical world we’d get rid
of those offences.”
Source - How's The War On Drugs Going, Crikey
No comments:
Post a Comment